And The Winner Is…

I am already starting to question the wisdom of entering short story competitions, having failed at the first hurdle only last week. Litro didn’t think my effort was good enough, and I went through about seven emotions in as many seconds when I got their email. Failure hurts, especially when you have constructed your writing year on a foundation of hubris. So, if you are going to enter any of the competitions listed at the end of this post, be prepared for rejection, and lots of it. I have already resolved to enter only my best short stories because really, what’s the point in doing it any other way? There are the fees to consider where these things are concerned and unless you are entering your best work, you may as well just throw money away. This may seem screamingly obvious, but there are people who enter as many competitions as possible to increase their chances of winning something, anything. This seems foolish, desperate even…and you need to consider whether winning a particular prize is of any real value to your career as a writer. I am posting links to competitions up until June, and in June I will post links through to September, though if you follow The New Writer on Twitter, you’ll get updates regarding just about every competition in existence. Another good source of information is The Book Trust though with both of these, exercise an element of caution. Read the small print and try and gauge the worth of the prize you are entering. By this, I mean the worth to you as a writer in bothering to enter, and indeed the worth of winning the prize itself, not the monetary worth. It may well be that a small and enterprising group of literary sorts on the south coast of England has decided to put together a literary prize, but if they have a rubbish website, or they are judging it themselves rather than appointing somebody of note…well, again, what’s the point? Winning prizes (to my mind, anyway) is all about getting noticed. And you are only really going to get noticed if you win a competition that people actually rate. What I am looking for in a literary prize is a solid reputation spanning several years, a certain buzz about it on Twitter, an impressive judging panel, and the possibility of being read by an agent or offered further publishing opportunities. One of these is good, all of them is a dream come true. I haven’t mentioned the cash element because that is absolutely secondary to getting noticed. Yes a few quid would be nice, but wouldn’t seeing your story in an anthology or having your novel looked at by somebody with influence be nicer? And before I launch into the hitlist for Spring/Summer, here’s a perspective from The Literary Review on prizes, vanity and the importance of being less earnest. It’s thought-provoking stuff. Ultimately, should we bother entering competitions at all? Louise Palfreyman is a member of PowWow Writers’ Group.


Deadline February 28:

Fish Flash Fiction

The Multi-Story Short Story Competition

The London School of Liberal Arts

Deadline March 1:

The Bryan MacMahon Short Story Award

The White Review

The Neil Gunn Writing Competition? theme: ‘the tenderness of stone’

Deadline March 8:

National Flash Fiction Day 100 word story competition

Deadline March 11:

BBC National Short Story Award 10am close

Deadline March 30:

Bath Short Story Award

Deadline March 31:

Aeon sci-fi, fantasy and horror…says 2012 on website, but the quarterly rounds and deadlines apply for 2013


Flash 500

Moth Short Story Prize

Short Fiction Journal

Love On the Road theme: ‘heartbreak’

Twisted Stringybark Erotic Fiction Short Story Award

Five Stop Story publication on the Five Stop iphone app, kindle and at five stops on the tube

Deadline April 1:

Limnisa Blue Thumbnail win a week’s holiday in Greece. Ok, so this one may be more about the prize…

Deadline April 19:

Fowey Festival Du Maurier short story prize

Deadline April 30:

Bristol Short Story Prize

Lightship One Page Prize

Deadline May 31:

Bridport Prize

Yeovil Literary Prize

Frome Festival Prize


New critique night!

Following recent discussions I am delighted to announce a new monthly critique night. This will take place at the Prince in our usual room, at 8pm on the second Wednesday of every month. Each evening will consist of four half hour slots; the reader can decide themselves how much preamble to do, how much to read and how much time to leave for feedback, but timings will be strictly enforced. We”ll have a 10-15 minute break after the second reading, so we”ll finish at 10.15 approx. Because there”ll be no introductions, punctuality will be very important.

The booking form for the first evening (Wednesday March 13th) will be available at the next Pow-Wow, on a first come, first served basis. Bookings for subsequent Wednesdays will only be available at Wednesday meetings.

We”ve got the room booked for these sessions for the remainder of the year, but I”m running them on a trial basis. If they”re poorly attended, or affect attendance at Tuesdays, we”ll have to review them. Of course if they take off and there”s demand, we can look to have a second night each month. We”ll see how it goes.